Wednesday, September 26, 2012

W3_DI_VESSEL SPEED PROBLEM



1.    Problem recognition, definition and evaluation
Last time in the Lombok strait at 05:00 LT, there has been damage on Vessels X’s main engine. After investigation founded that the root of the problem is in the turbocharger lubricant system. The lubricant system did not work properly, so it makes shaft and ball bearing overheating and cause some damage on rotor (shaft, turbine and compressor wheel), backplate, and ball bearing.

 Figure 1. Cut view Turbocharger


In order to restore vessel speed performance, ship manager need to fix this turbocharger main engine problem.

2.   Development of the feasible alternatives

After doing discussion and evaluation, we decide three options to fix this problem, as follows:
-          Option 1: Repair with machining rotor and replace broken parts using 2nd class part.
-          Option 2: Repair with replace rotor and broken parts only using genuine part.
-          Option 3: Replace with the new turbocharger unit
 
3.       Development of the outcomes
 The detail information for each option as in table below:


Option 1
Option 2
Option 3







4.     Selection of the acceptable criteria.
Concern of Ship manager is to comply with Vessel X’s Financial KPI, this mean that we will choose the option with best NPV.

5.      Analysis and comparison of the alternatives
Comparison of the three options using the PW Method with MRR 12%, calculations for each option are:       

PW1                 : -75,000 – 35,000(P/A, 12%, 5) + 10,000(P/F, 12%, 5)
                        : -75,000 – 35,000(3.605) + 10,000(0.5674)
                        : -75,000 – 126,175 + 5,674
                        : - 195,501

PW2                 : -120,000 – 30,000(P/A, 12%, 5) + 30,000(P/F, 12%, 5)
        : -120,000 – 30,000(3.605) + 30,000(0.5674)
                        : -120,000 – 108,150 + 17,022
                        : - 211,128

PW3                 : -200,000 – 15,000(P/A, 12%, 5) + 75,000(P/F, 12%, 5)
        : -200,000 – 15,000(3.605) + 75,000(0.5674)
                        : -200,000 – 54,075 + 42,555
                        : - 211,520

6.     Selection of the preferred alternative
Based on our calculation the repair option 1 is the best result. So we will repair turbocharger with re-machine rotor and replace broken parts with 2nd class part.

7.      Performance Monitoring & Post Evaluation of Result
The repair with option 1 takes total six day repair time. The speed of Vessel X is 11.5 knots which mean that she meet her KPI and everyone will happy.

Reference: 
         i.    William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, and C. Patrick Koelling (2011), Engineering Economy (15th Edition), Chapter 6 (p.226-p240)
       ii.     Using turbocharger for a jet engine, retrieved from: 
      iii.    Purdue online writing lab. Reference List: Electronic Sources (Web Publications). Retrieved from :



1 comment:

  1. AWESOME, Daniel!!! Another really impressive application of what you are learning to your real life projects!!

    You not only get credit for your blog posting but you also can claim credit for one of the problems from Chapter 6 in Engineering Economy.

    And my question to you, is this purely a financial decision? Or are there other considerations which you could or should be taking into consideration in making this decision?

    Could you set this up as a decision tree as well? Chapter 12, pages 506-511? Is this the kind of problem that lends itself to multi attribute decision making? (Chapter 14) Or how about running a break even or sensitivity analysis using the same case study?

    See where I am going with this? You have an excellent case study, so are there any other tools/techniques you can find in Humphrey's or Engineering Economy that can help you come up with a solution?

    Keep up the great work and looking forward to seeing more postings like this in the coming weeks.....

    BR,
    Dr. PDG, Jakarta

    ReplyDelete