W2_FELIX_Contract Type
1. Problem
Recognition, Definition and Evaluation
I just receive an order to manage
and complete a new project i.e. Bidding Assistance and Burner Tip Procurement
services for NPU H2rich Gas recovery.
The Project scope of work is as follow:
a. EPC Bidding Assistance
Technical
& Commercial Bid Clarifications and Evaluation and summary of EPC Bids up
to Recommendation to EPC award.
b. Burner Tip Procurement (Pre and Post Order Services)
Material
Requisition Preparation, Vendor RFG, TBE and CBE up to Purchase Order with
Vendor
I have already develop TOR (Term of
reference) and ready to hire a consulting agency to assist and complete the
project.
The next step is to make bidding
strategy and also the type of contract should be used for this project.
2. Alternatives of the contract type
Based from Engineering tool box (www.engineeringtoolbox.com) there are 5 (five) common types of
contracts which is used in the engineering and construction industry i.e:
a. Lump Sum Contract
b. Unit Price Contract
c. Cost Plus Contract
d. Incentive Contracts
e. Percentage of Construction Fee Contracts
3. The outcomes for each contract type
a.
Lump Sum Contract
With this kind of contract the contractor agrees to do
the described and specified project for a fixed price. Also named "Fixed
Fee Contract".
This contract type may define various milestones for
the deliveries as well as KPIs (Key Performance Indicators). In addition, the
contractor may have an acceptance criteria defined for the milestones and the
final delivery.
The main advantages of this type of contract is that
the contractor knows the total project cost before the project commences.
A Fixed Fee or Lump Sum Contract is suitable if the
scope and schedule of the project are sufficiently defined to allow the
consulting engineer to estimate project costs.
b.
Unit Price Contract
This kind of contract is based on estimated quantities
of items included in the project and their unit prices. The final price of the
project is dependent on the quantities needed to carry out the work.
Usually the owner (contractor/client) of the project
decides on the estimates and asks the bidders to bid of each element of the
project.
c.
Cost Plus Contract
A contract agreement wherein the purchaser agrees to
pay the cost of all labor and materials plus an amount for contractor overhead
and profit.
In this contract model, the services provider is
reimbursed for their machinery, labor, and other costs, in addition to
contractor paying an agreed fee to the services provider. In this method, the
services provider should offer a detailed schedule and the resource allocation
for the project. Apart from that, all the costs should be properly listed and
should be reported to the contractor periodically.
d.
Incentive Contracts
Compensation is based on the engineering and/or
contracting performance according an agreed target - budget, schedule and/or
quality.
The two basic categories of incentive contracts are
· Fixed Price Incentive Contracts
· Cost Reimbursement Incentive Contracts
Fixed Price Incentive Contracts are preferred when
contract costs and performance requirements are reasonably certain.
Cost Reimbursement Contract provides the initially
negotiated fee to be adjusted later by a formula based on the relationship of
total allowable costs to total target costs..
e.
Percentage of Construction Fee Contracts
Compensation is based on a
percentage of the construction costs. Based on the resources and material
required, the cost for the construction is estimated.Then, the client contracts a service
provider and pays a percentage of the cost of the project as the fee for the
services provider.
4. Selection of
criteria.
In order to determine what kind of
contract should be used there are some criteria must be considered:
-
Price competition.
-
Price analysis.
-
Cost analysis
-
Type and complexity of the requirement.
-
Urgency of the requirement.
-
Period of performance or length of production run.
-
Contractor's technical capability and financial
responsibility.
The detail criteria will be
discussed on next blog.
5. Analysis for the
alternatives
By understanding the scope and definition of the work we can analyze that :
- The project require
a consultant agent with have specialty for the technology (refinery system).
- The project
have risk of uncertainty volume, and uncertainty duration.
-
The
unit rate will be fix and agreed with the consultant.
-
Total
price depends on the actual number of hours that have been spent multiplied by
the agreed unit rate.
6. Select the
preferred alternative
Base from the above analysis I make
sort out the contract become only two types i.e
a. Cost Plus contract
b. Cost
Reimbursement Incentive Contracts
In this case I choose Cost plus
contract with the consideration that our regulation not yet equipped with the
incentive contracts.
7. Performance
Monitoring & Post Evaluation of Result
The performance monitoring and post evaluation of this
contract will be report at actual data on 3 month period after.
Reference:
i.
Factors in
Selecting Contract Types
ii.
The Engineering Tool Box:
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/contract-types-d_925.html
iii.
Project Contract Types
http://www.tutorialspoint.com/management_concepts/project_contract_types.htm
iv.
Project Management
Knowledge
http://project-management-knowledge.com/definitions/c/cost-reimbursable-contract/
Excellent case study for you blog posting and you followed our Step by Step process very well, BUT.... Your Step 5 Analysis was very weak. How is it you came to the conclusions you did in Step 6? What I am looking for would be some kind of qualitative or quantitative analysis. You could have used Force Field Analysis (See what Trian has been doing) or better yet, you could have used one of the multi-attribute decision making models from Chapter 14 of your Engineering Economics? Another Chapter from Engineering Economy that might help you would be Chapter 6, Comparison and Selection Between Alternatives? Or perhaps Chapter 10, Evaluating Projects (Options) with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method?
ReplyDeleteWhat I am trying to encourage you to do is to work smart by COMBINING the use of the tools and techniques from Engineering Economy and/or Humphrey's to solve real life working problems. So you have picked a really great case study, but by demonstrating you are using the tools & techniques from the references, you could also be getting credit for doing them as well.
Keep up the good work and for your W3 posting, I would urge you to take the same problem but expand Step 5 to include an analysis from Chapter 14 especially.
BR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta