Problem definition
“Projects in Sudan are
experiencing far to many change orders. This analysis is to explore what are
the causes and how can we reduce the number of change orders”. I have published
this chapter earlier in another group, however here I modified it as per the
CfH comments.
Development of the feasible alternatives
-Design Change
-Project resources/Material
-Wrong Estimation
-Unforeseen Conditions
Development of the outcomes for each alternative
·
The project's work was incorrectly estimated
·
The customer or project team discovers obstacles or possible
efficiencies that require them to deviate from the original plan
·
The customer or project team are inefficient or incapable of
completing their required deliverable within budget, and additional money,
time, or resources must be added to the project
·
During the course of the project, additional features or
options are perceived and requested
·
The contractor looks for work items to add to the original
scope of work at a later time in order to achieve the lowest possible base bid
price, but then add work items and fee back on once the contractor has been
hired for the work. This is an exploitative practice.
Accepted Criteria
Considering the use of
root cause analysis and the Ordinal Ranking, the causes was evaluated and
ranked accordingly.
Analysis and comparison of the alternatives
The Causes for change
requests/orders in oil & gas projects has been analyzed by the cause &
effect fish-bone diagram.
Cause and Effect Diagram, Author |
Table 1-1 Ordinal
Ranking of Changer order causes attributes:
Attribute
|
Rank
|
A-Result of
Paired Comparisons
|
|
Design Change > Wrong
Estimation
|
Design Change affect
more than Wrong Estimation
|
Design Change > Unforeseen
Conditions
|
Design Change affect
more than Unforeseen Conditions
|
Design Change > Project
resources/Material
|
Design Change affect
more than Project resources/Material
|
Wrong Estimation >
Unforeseen Conditions
|
Wrong Estimation affect
more than Unforeseen Conditions
|
Project resources/Material
> Wrong Estimation
|
Project resources/Material
affect more than Wrong Estimation
|
Project resources/Material
> Unforeseen Conditions
|
Project resources/Material
affect more than Unforeseen Conditions
|
B-Attribute
|
Number of time
on left > (=Ordinal Ranking)
|
Design Change
|
3
|
Wrong Estimation
|
1
|
Project resources/Material
|
2
|
Unforeseen
Conditions
|
0
|
Rank of 3 = most
important, Rank of 0 = least important
|
Selection of the preferred alternatives
Following table 1-1, the
cause’s impact on the change order could be ranked as follows (starting with
highest):
1.
Design Change
2.
Project resources/Material
3.
Wrong Estimation
4.
Unforeseen Conditions
Considering the above
ranking, the main causes of change orders in Sudan oil & gas projects, is a
design change translated in a poor ITB, the same delivered to the contractor
with a lot of mistakes and missing parts, as a result of missing standardized
WBS to put the owner and the contractor in the same track.
Conclusion
One
of the main causes of change order is the poor planning of the project which
lead to poor ITB. Adopting a standard WBS will minimize the number of change
orders, and put contractor and owner in the same train. At the construction
stage, the coordination and communication amongst various parties working on
the project is of great importance to improve management and this controls
problems and reduce change order
References
Ø Michael Barssad, Diane
Ritter. (2010). the Memory Jogger 2. Chapter Cause and effect/fish bone diagram,
34.
Ø Juan
Rodriguez. (2011). Common Causes for a Change Order. Retrieved
from http://www.construction.about.com/od/Claims-Management/a/Common-Causes-For-A-Change-Order.htm
Ø Elrashid, M. (2011). Blog
W_2 Reasons behind change orders in Sudan. Retrieved from http://www. Kristal2011aace.wordpress.com
EXCELLENT posting, Rashid!!! Nice work!!!
ReplyDeleteI loved your case study and you did a really impressive job on your Root Cause Analysis.
The only thing that kept you from getting an AWESOME posting was your citations are not consistent with APA formatting.....
Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (Date of publication). Title of article. Title of Journal, volume number. Retrieved from http://www.journalhomepage.com/full/url/
You need to put the last names FIRST.......
Other than that, you are definitely on track this time around so keep up the good work.
BR,
Dr. PDG, AACE Symposium, Dubai, UAE
Dear Dr.Paul,
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot for you positive comments. i would like to inform you that this blog is exactly the same idea of my paper, so shall you have any further comments on the way of analysis and study, i would be very appreciated. thank you
BR
M.Rashid
This is what I want you to be doing. Using your blog as the basis to develop your paper.
ReplyDeleteJust keep on doing what you did above and you will be in good shape.
BR,
Dr. PDG AACE Symposium, Dubai UAE