Tuesday, November 13, 2012

W8_Mohammed_ Most Common causes of Change Orders In Sudan Projects



Problem definition
“Projects in Sudan are experiencing far to many change orders. This analysis is to explore what are the causes and how can we reduce the number of change orders”. I have published this chapter earlier in another group, however here I modified it as per the CfH comments.

Development of the feasible alternatives
-Design Change
-Project resources/Material
-Wrong Estimation
-Unforeseen Conditions

Development of the outcomes for each alternative
·   The project's work was incorrectly estimated
·   The customer or project team discovers obstacles or possible efficiencies that require them to deviate from the original plan
·   The customer or project team are inefficient or incapable of completing their required deliverable within budget, and additional money, time, or resources must be added to the project
·   During the course of the project, additional features or options are perceived and requested
·   The contractor looks for work items to add to the original scope of work at a later time in order to achieve the lowest possible base bid price, but then add work items and fee back on once the contractor has been hired for the work. This is an exploitative practice.

Accepted Criteria
Considering the use of root cause analysis and the Ordinal Ranking, the causes was evaluated and ranked accordingly.

Analysis and comparison of the alternatives
The Causes for change requests/orders in oil & gas projects has been analyzed by the cause & effect fish-bone diagram.

Cause and Effect Diagram, Author

Table 1-1 Ordinal Ranking of Changer order causes attributes:
Attribute
Rank
A-Result of Paired Comparisons

Design Change > Wrong Estimation
Design Change affect more than Wrong Estimation
Design Change > Unforeseen Conditions
Design Change affect more than Unforeseen Conditions
Design Change > Project resources/Material
Design Change affect more than Project resources/Material
Wrong Estimation > Unforeseen Conditions
Wrong Estimation affect more than Unforeseen Conditions
Project resources/Material > Wrong Estimation
Project resources/Material affect more than Wrong Estimation
Project resources/Material > Unforeseen Conditions
Project resources/Material affect more than Unforeseen Conditions
B-Attribute
Number of time on left > (=Ordinal Ranking)
Design Change
3
Wrong Estimation
1
Project resources/Material
2
Unforeseen Conditions
0
Rank of 3 = most important, Rank of 0 = least important

Selection of the preferred alternatives
Following table 1-1, the cause’s impact on the change order could be ranked as follows (starting with highest):
1.      Design Change
2.      Project resources/Material
3.      Wrong Estimation
4.      Unforeseen Conditions

Performance monitoring and the post evaluation of results
Considering the above ranking, the main causes of change orders in Sudan oil & gas projects, is a design change translated in a poor ITB, the same delivered to the contractor with a lot of mistakes and missing parts, as a result of missing standardized WBS to put the owner and the contractor in the same track.

Conclusion
One of the main causes of change order is the poor planning of the project which lead to poor ITB. Adopting a standard WBS will minimize the number of change orders, and put contractor and owner in the same train. At the construction stage, the coordination and communication amongst various parties working on the project is of great importance to improve management and this controls problems and reduce change order

References

Ø      Michael Barssad, Diane Ritter. (2010). the Memory Jogger 2. Chapter Cause and effect/fish bone diagram, 34.
Ø      Juan Rodriguez. (2011). Common Causes for a Change Order. Retrieved from http://www.construction.about.com/od/Claims-Management/a/Common-Causes-For-A-Change-Order.htm
Ø      Elrashid, M. (2011). Blog W_2 Reasons behind change orders in Sudan. Retrieved from http://www. Kristal2011aace.wordpress.com

*
 

3 comments:

  1. EXCELLENT posting, Rashid!!! Nice work!!!

    I loved your case study and you did a really impressive job on your Root Cause Analysis.

    The only thing that kept you from getting an AWESOME posting was your citations are not consistent with APA formatting.....

    Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (Date of publication). Title of article. Title of Journal, volume number. Retrieved from http://www.journalhomepage.com/full/url/

    You need to put the last names FIRST.......

    Other than that, you are definitely on track this time around so keep up the good work.

    BR,
    Dr. PDG, AACE Symposium, Dubai, UAE

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Dr.Paul,
    Thanks a lot for you positive comments. i would like to inform you that this blog is exactly the same idea of my paper, so shall you have any further comments on the way of analysis and study, i would be very appreciated. thank you
    BR
    M.Rashid

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is what I want you to be doing. Using your blog as the basis to develop your paper.

    Just keep on doing what you did above and you will be in good shape.

    BR,
    Dr. PDG AACE Symposium, Dubai UAE

    ReplyDelete