Problem definition
Considering the ranking
given in Blog 8 as indicated above, the main causes of change orders in Sudan
oil & gas projects, is a design change translated in a poor ITB, the same
delivered to the contractor with a lot of mistakes and missing parts, as a
result of missing standardized WBS to put the owner and the contractor in the
same track.
This Blog will take a case
study developed as per the current non-standard WBS used in our projects and
compare it to the standardized WBS to indicate the possible gaps.
Development of the feasible alternatives
There are three
(3) WBS alternatives to compare to answer the question above:
1. Current non
standard WBS
2. OmniClass Table 31
Phases: Table 31 – Phases, is the only OmniClass table that explains the stages
(higher level of categorization than phases) of the project activity from
conception until project closure.
3. J-Y 3D model: The 3D WBS
theory includes three main dimensions: the Zones GBS), the Products (PBS) and
the Activity (ABS). The fourth dimension is the Organization (OBS) which
colors the little 3D cubes (tasks) of the project cube. The OBS is extended by
the RBS. Each 3D little cube has properties.
Development of the outcomes for each alternative
Finding the
optimum WBS which could be fitted our purpose for the Sudanese Projects.
Accepted Criteria
There are three (3)
criteria that have been selected as parameters to analyze and compare the above
alternatives:
1.
WBS
level of details, this will explain how detail each alternative structures
their WBS for design process.
2.
Number
of design activity phase, is the number of engineering phase from the project
scope development to the final design.
3.
Work
flow of activities, is how the activities work together from the project scope
development to the final design.
4.
Complexity
of the WBS
Analysis and comparison of the alternatives
Lexicography, one of
non-compensatory models for multi attributes decision making technique, has
been chosen to compare and analyze the alternatives. The followings are
typical WBS of each alternative:
Will take the engineering stage as an example for the
comparison:
1. Current WBS (Non Standard):
Here Engineering is divided
to three parts, where the Conceptual Phase usually this phase conducted by the
Client; however the rest of the engineering activities (Basic and Detailed) are
conducted by the contractor.
Figure
1 – Non Standard WBS
2. Omni Class:
Figure
2 – OmniClass Table 31 – Phases – WBS
3. J-Y 3D WBS model
Selection of the preferred alternatives
Each WBS comparison of the
attributes is expressed in table 1:
Table 1 – Summary Information of Engineering
Design Stage WBS
|
Attributes
|
Our Current WBS
|
OmniClass Table 31-Phases
|
3D WBS
|
1
|
WBS Level of Details
|
Fair
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
2
|
Number of Design activity Phases
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
3
|
Complexity
|
Easy
|
Moderate
|
Difficult
|
4
|
Work flow of activities
|
Fair
|
Good
|
V.Good
|
All attributes in table 1, be ranked in order of
importance by doing paired comparison between each possible attribute
combination. Result as shown on table 2:
Table 2 – Ordinal Ranking of Attributes
Ordinal Ranking of
Attributes
|
||
|
A. Result of Paired Comparison
|
|
|
WBS details > work Flow
|
WBS details is more important than work Flow
|
|
WBS details > Number of Design activities
|
WBS details is more important than Number of
Design activities
|
|
WBS details > Complexity
|
WBS details is more important than Complexity
|
|
Number of Design activities > Work Flows
|
Number of Design activities is more important
than Work Flows
|
|
Complexity > Number of Design activities
|
Complexity is more important than Number of
Design activities
|
|
Complexity > Work Flow
|
Complexity is more important than Work Flow
|
|
|
|
|
B. Attributes
|
Number of times on
left of >(=Ordinal Ranking)
|
|
WBS Level of Details
|
3
|
|
Number of Design activity Phases
|
1
|
|
Complexity
|
2
|
|
Work flow of activities
|
0
|
Table 2 – Ordinal Ranking of Attributes
Based on table 2, the ranking is found to be WBS
Level of details > Complexity > Number of design activity phase > Work
flow of activities.
Application of Lexicography
|
||
Attributes
|
Rank (a)
|
Alternative (b)
|
WBS Level of Details
|
3
|
3D WBS = OmniClass (Table 31-Phases) > Current WBS
|
Complexity
|
2
|
Current WBS > OmniClass (Table
31-Phases) > 3D WBS
|
Number of Design
activity Phases
|
1
|
3D WBS = OmniClass (Table 31-Phases) >
Current WBS
|
Work flow of
activities
|
0
|
3D WBS > OmniClass (Table
31-Phases) > Current WBS
|
Note:
(a) Rank of 3 = Most Important, Rank of 0 =
Least Important
(b) Selection is based on the highest ranked
attribute
Considering the above
ranking, since the main causes of change orders in Sudan oil & gas projects, is a
design change translated in a poor ITB. The 3D model was found the optimum
selection as to be adapted to standardize the WBS and to put the owner and the
contractor in the same track.
Conclusion
The preferred alternative according to table 3
is 3D model. This is because the WBS level of details and number of design
activity phases are the top ranked attributes and the 3D model is the best of
all over the two attributes. This will have a positive impact on reducing the
possible change orders by refining the scope and eliminating any possible
omissions or errors.
References
Ø
CSI
OmniClass (2010), OmniClass A Strategy for Classifying the Built Environment
[OmniClass Table 31- Phases]. Retrieved from
http://www.omniclass.org/tables/OmniClass_31_2006-03-28.pdf
Ø
Sullivan,
G., William, Wicks, M., Elin, Koelling, Patrick, C. (2009), Engineering
Economic, Fifteenth Edition. Pearson International Edition.
Ø
Elrashid,
M. (2011). Blog W_8 Reasons behind change orders in Sudan. Retrieved from http://www.
Kristal2011aace.wordpress.com
Ø
Gustaf
, Gannasonggo (2012).Blog W4_GGS_Engineering Design Stage WBS Comparison Using
Non Compensatory Technique – Lexicography, Retrieved from
http://aacecasablanca.wordpress.com/
Ø
Jean-Yves,
Moine's. (2012), 3D Work Breakdown Structure , Retrieved from
http://3d-wbs.blogspot.com/
AWESOME posting, Muhammad!!! Now I am growing confident that you understand how this three dimensional approach can help significantly in reducing "missing" scope.
ReplyDeleteThe more ways you can look at your project, the less likely you are to miss something important....
Keep up the good work and looking forward to seeing your paper!!!
BR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta
actually i post this blog to get your comments, since its typically what im doing in my second part of my paper. what do you think?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletewhat type of program did you use? can is it also compute for the accurate dimension of 455 stainless bars?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGood article !
ReplyDeleteFor the engineering, Zones are functional, some companies call it "Process Unit", and other "Working Unit". Zones become physical (geographical) from the procurement to the construction.
Best regards,
Great share!!! it was detailed research thanks for it. The Project Manager’s first step is creating the work breakdown structure (WBS), a step that then enables subsequent planning of the work processes and schedule for accomplishing the project. After the WBS is developed, reviewed, and finalized, the structure is evaluated to determine the processes needed along with the schedule and costs required to achieve each of the identified goals. Primavera P6 tool is really usefull to level our project using both its project and activity leveling priorities Primavera Training
ReplyDeleteMS Project Training
Great post! I really appreciate your good efforts and this is the best blog for this title. I waiting for your more posts...
ReplyDeletePrimavera Training in Chennai
Primavera Course in Chennai
Corporate Training in Chennai
Embedded System Course Chennai
Oracle Training in Chennai
Tableau Training in Chennai
Spark Training in Chennai
Excel Training in Chennai
Power BI Training in Chennai
Thank you for your kind words.
DeleteGreat work !!
ReplyDeletethank you, where i can find your 3D Work Breakdown Structure blogs?.
Deletegreat one ever nice view this site
ReplyDeleteoracle training in chennai
Having read this I believed it was extremely informative. I appreciate you finding the time and energy to put this content together. I once again find myself personally spending a significant amount of time both reading and leaving comments. But so what, it was still worth it!
ReplyDeleteTechnology