Wednesday, January 2, 2013

W10_Mohammed_ Our Current WBS Vs OmniClass and 3D model




Problem definition

Considering the ranking given in Blog 8 as indicated above, the main causes of change orders in Sudan oil & gas projects, is a design change translated in a poor ITB, the same delivered to the contractor with a lot of mistakes and missing parts, as a result of missing standardized WBS to put the owner and the contractor in the same track.
This Blog will take a case study developed as per the current non-standard WBS used in our projects and compare it to the standardized WBS to indicate the possible gaps.

Development of the feasible alternatives
There are three (3) WBS alternatives to compare to answer the question above:
1. Current non standard WBS
2. OmniClass Table 31 Phases: Table 31 – Phases, is the only OmniClass table that explains the stages (higher level of categorization than phases) of the project activity from conception until project closure.
3. J-Y 3D model: The 3D WBS theory includes three main dimensions: the Zones GBS), the Products (PBS) and the Activity (ABS).  The fourth dimension is the Organization (OBS) which colors the little 3D cubes (tasks) of the project cube. The OBS is extended by the RBS. Each 3D little cube has properties.

Development of the outcomes for each alternative
Finding the optimum WBS which could be fitted our purpose for the Sudanese Projects.

Accepted Criteria
There are three (3) criteria that have been selected as parameters to analyze and compare the above alternatives:
1.       WBS level of details, this will explain how detail each alternative structures their WBS for design process.
2.       Number of design activity phase, is the number of engineering phase from the project scope development to the final design.
3.       Work flow of activities, is how the activities work together from the project scope development to the final design.
4.       Complexity of the WBS

Analysis and comparison of the alternatives
Lexicography, one of non-compensatory models for multi attributes decision making technique, has been chosen to compare and analyze the alternatives. The followings are typical WBS of each alternative:

Will take the engineering stage as an example for the comparison:
1.  Current WBS (Non Standard):
Here Engineering is divided to three parts, where the Conceptual Phase usually this phase conducted by the Client; however the rest of the engineering activities (Basic and Detailed) are conducted by the contractor.
Figure 1 – Non Standard WBS

2.  Omni Class:
Figure 2 – OmniClass Table 31 – Phases – WBS


3.   J-Y 3D WBS model


Selection of the preferred alternatives
Each WBS comparison of the attributes is expressed in table 1:

Table 1 – Summary Information of Engineering Design Stage WBS

Attributes
Our Current WBS
OmniClass Table 31-Phases
3D WBS
1
WBS Level of Details
Fair
Excellent
Excellent
2
Number of Design activity Phases
3
4
4
3
Complexity
Easy
Moderate
Difficult
4
Work flow of activities
Fair
Good
V.Good
All attributes in table 1, be ranked in order of importance by doing paired comparison between each possible attribute combination. Result as shown on table 2:

Table 2 – Ordinal Ranking of Attributes
Ordinal Ranking of Attributes

A. Result of Paired Comparison


WBS details > work Flow
WBS details is more important than work Flow

WBS details > Number of Design activities
WBS details is more important than Number of Design activities

WBS details > Complexity
WBS details is more important than Complexity

Number of Design activities > Work Flows
Number of Design activities is more important than Work Flows

Complexity > Number of Design activities
Complexity is more important than Number of Design activities

Complexity > Work Flow
Complexity is more important than Work Flow




B. Attributes
Number of times on left of >(=Ordinal Ranking)

WBS Level of Details
3

Number of Design activity Phases
1

Complexity
2

Work flow of activities
0
Table 2 – Ordinal Ranking of Attributes

Based on table 2, the ranking is found to be WBS Level of details > Complexity > Number of design activity phase > Work flow of activities.
Application of  Lexicography
Attributes
Rank (a)
Alternative (b)
WBS Level of Details
3
3D WBS  = OmniClass (Table 31-Phases) > Current WBS
Complexity
2
Current WBS > OmniClass (Table 31-Phases) > 3D WBS
Number of Design activity Phases
1
3D WBS = OmniClass (Table 31-Phases) > Current WBS
Work flow of activities
0
3D WBS > OmniClass (Table 31-Phases) > Current WBS
Note:
(a) Rank of 3 = Most Important, Rank of 0 = Least Important
(b) Selection is based on the highest ranked attribute

Performance monitoring and the post evaluation of results
Considering the above ranking, since the main causes of change orders in Sudan oil & gas projects, is a design change translated in a poor ITB. The 3D model was found the optimum selection as to be adapted to standardize the WBS and to put the owner and the contractor in the same track.

Conclusion

The preferred alternative according to table 3 is 3D model. This is because the WBS level of details and number of design activity phases are the top ranked attributes and the 3D model is the best of all over the two attributes. This will have a positive impact on reducing the possible change orders by refining the scope and eliminating any possible omissions or errors.



References
Ø      CSI OmniClass (2010), OmniClass A Strategy for Classifying the Built Environment [OmniClass Table 31- Phases]. Retrieved from http://www.omniclass.org/tables/OmniClass_31_2006-03-28.pdf
Ø      Sullivan, G., William, Wicks, M., Elin, Koelling, Patrick, C. (2009), Engineering Economic, Fifteenth Edition. Pearson International Edition.
Ø      Elrashid, M. (2011). Blog W_8 Reasons behind change orders in Sudan. Retrieved from http://www. Kristal2011aace.wordpress.com
Ø      Gustaf , Gannasonggo (2012).Blog W4_GGS_Engineering Design Stage WBS Comparison Using Non Compensatory Technique – Lexicography, Retrieved from http://aacecasablanca.wordpress.com/
Ø      Jean-Yves, Moine's. (2012), 3D Work Breakdown Structure , Retrieved from http://3d-wbs.blogspot.com/

13 comments:

  1. AWESOME posting, Muhammad!!! Now I am growing confident that you understand how this three dimensional approach can help significantly in reducing "missing" scope.

    The more ways you can look at your project, the less likely you are to miss something important....

    Keep up the good work and looking forward to seeing your paper!!!

    BR,
    Dr. PDG, Jakarta

    ReplyDelete
  2. actually i post this blog to get your comments, since its typically what im doing in my second part of my paper. what do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. what type of program did you use? can is it also compute for the accurate dimension of 455 stainless bars?

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Good article !

    For the engineering, Zones are functional, some companies call it "Process Unit", and other "Working Unit". Zones become physical (geographical) from the procurement to the construction.

    Best regards,

    ReplyDelete
  7. Great share!!! it was detailed research thanks for it. The Project Manager’s first step is creating the work breakdown structure (WBS), a step that then enables subsequent planning of the work processes and schedule for accomplishing the project. After the WBS is developed, reviewed, and finalized, the structure is evaluated to determine the processes needed along with the schedule and costs required to achieve each of the identified goals. Primavera P6 tool is really usefull to level our project using both its project and activity leveling priorities Primavera Training
    MS Project Training

    ReplyDelete
  8. Replies
    1. thank you, where i can find your 3D Work Breakdown Structure blogs?.

      Delete
  9. Having read this I believed it was extremely informative. I appreciate you finding the time and energy to put this content together. I once again find myself personally spending a significant amount of time both reading and leaving comments. But so what, it was still worth it!
    Technology

    ReplyDelete