1. Problem recognition, definition and
evaluation
The economy of Indonesia has well grown which impacts to Indonesian’s
welfare. As a result, food-based business becomes star among general
industries. The demand of cow and chicken meat, two main favorite menus for
Indonesian, in addition eggs have increased gradually in recent years.
As cow meat is still mostly imported, Government is then encouraging
farmers and breeders to farm poultry in villages through partnership program
with Local Cooperation to avoid importing chicken or eggs in the future. The farmers have to provide the cage and
manpower for breeding poultry, while Cooperation provides poultry, selling, transportation
and its food during breeding. The risk for the farmers is manageable, since
they don’t take into account if the poultry die due to diseases or disasters.
Therefore, an economic
analysis is required to look at such business opportunity.
2. Development of the feasible alternative
There are 2 types of farming poultry, i.e. White and Red Poultry.
·
White Poultry:
to breed the type of poultry that will be made for the chicken meat. The
lifecycle of white farming is only 40 days, plus preparation and cleaning
becomes 2 months (6 times / year).
·
Red Poultry:
to breed the type of poultry that will be used for eggs-processing purpose. The
lifecycle of red farming is 4 months, plus preparation and cleaning becomes 5
months (2 times / year).
In facts, the white poultry has higher risk rather than the red ones,
since it has higher probability on poultry death. In addition, the whine poultry
has worse smell that being complained by environment and leads to more retribution.
3. Development of the outcome
The types of cost for building and running the farming are:
·
Investment
Cost (initial cost to set up the cage/farming house for about 3 months)
·
Manpower
(cost assumed 10% increase / yr)
·
Electrical
Power (cost assumed 5% increase / yr)
·
Vaccines, Fogging
(cost assumed 5% increase / yr)
·
Local Retribution
and Tax (cost assumed 5% increase / yr)
·
Others
(cost assumed 5% increase / yr)
Meanwhile, the revenue is from the selling of poultry and its feces
(price assumed 5% increase / yr).
4. Selection of criteria
The most prospective farming, in term of economics, is seen from BEP, IRR
and NPV generated from Free Cash Flow (FCF). The discount rate used in analysis
refers to WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital).
5. Analysis
The cash flow of each farming type is as follows:
Figure 1. FCF White Farming
Then, WACC is calculated based on the forecasted capital structure
(conservative model used Tax 10%).
WACC = (Portion Equity x Equity Rate) +
(Portion Loan x Loan Rate) (1 – Tax)
= (0.4 x 20%) + (0.6 x 13%) (1 – 10%)
= 15%
According to Figure 1, Figure 2 and the calculated discount rate, the
economic indicators of each farming type are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. White Farming
Indicators
Table 2. Red Farming Indicators
6. Selection of alternative
Based on analysis above, the white poultry is the most interesting
investment in this farming. However, the
white poultry also provides higher risk (death, pollution), in which investors/farmers
has to take into account. Consequently, an advance analysis needs to be
conducted to balance between benefit and its risk.
7. Performance monitoring and
post-evaluation of results
In conclusion, the partnership model of poultry farming is beneficial
for investors/farmers. But, the advance analysis is required to balance the
benefit of each type of farming and its risk. Furthermore, in order to lower
the risk, another business action may be taken, such as acquiring existing poultry
farm that has settled and proved in the farming system. Such an acquisition
will make the alternative options wider for getting the purpose of optimum investment.
References:
·
Bridel,
Wes. (2009). Rate of Return: Beyond the Basics. Retrieved from : http://www.kingdomcalling.com/2009/10/14/rate-of-return-beyond-the-basics/
·
How to
calculate your Return on Investment. Retrieved from :
http://www.fatpitchfinancials.com/392/how-to-calculate-your-return-on-investment/
·
Sullivan,
G. William, Wicks, Elin M & Koelling, C. Patrick. (2012). Engineering
Economic 15th Edition: Chapter 5 Evaluation a Single Project, pp. 180-208
Ha ha ha ha...... When I was a kid in high school, I used to work on a chicken farm...... And we used a CROSS breed between White roosters and Red hens.... (egg production) So your case study brought back funny memories from long, long ago!!
ReplyDeleteAnyway, you picked another very interesting case study and my only question is why did you choose Chapter 5, Evaluating a SINGLE project instead of Chapter 6, Selecting Between Two Alternatives? Not saying what you did was wrong, but as you are preparing for the exam, you want to pay attention to these details as it may make a difference in the answer.
Either way, you do have to perform another analysis and not sure if you've spent any time in Chapter 13 yet, but that might be a good place to look to see if that would be the appropriate way to balance the additional risks of White vs Red poultry.....??? (HINT: I think you will find the MARR to be higher than 10%?
Anyway, think about how best to compare these two very different options and see what other tools/techniques you can apply which will help you decide...
BR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta
Hi Dr Paul..
ReplyDeleteTo clarify it, MARR made equal to WACC 15%, not 10%. I used Tax 10% (personal/SME tax) instead of 25% (corporate tax) for calculating WACC as conservative mode, because if i applied 25% my WACC would be lower.
The farm partnership model is very prospective business for the farmer (IRR > MARR, NPV > 0). However, agree with your suggestion, those economic benefits should be adjusted with its risk applied for each option of investments, i.e. new farm or acquisition.
Very nice and informative blog. Poultry farming is absolutely a lucrative business. I always search for this types of news and blog post related to poultry birds and poultry farming business. Really enjoyed your website writings.
ReplyDeletePoultry Farming