Friday, February 1, 2013

W13_DI_2013 SHIP MANAGEMENT BIDDING



1.  Problem recognition, definition and evaluation
Management already decided to use other Ship Management to manage some tankers. The goals are not only to increase financial and operational performance but also for giving in-house ship management positive competitor. Now, we are in a bidding evaluation process to choose the best and suitable ship management.

2.  Development of the feasible alternatives
There are 3 best bidders that survived until stage 3 bidding, as follow:
          - Ship Management A
          - Ship Management B
          - Ship Management C

3.  Development of the outcomes
Evaluation will use compensatory models decision making with scoring system.

4.  Selection criteria.
The acceptable criteria in this bidding evaluation are:
          a.       Minimum requirement, as follow:
 Figure - 1. Minimum Requirement List

      b.  Weight requirement using scoring system with component, which is presence, experience, systems, people, regulation compliance and other.

5.    Analysis and comparison of the alternatives
 Attributes Weight:

                                                              Figure - 2. Weight Requirement detail

   Weight Scores

   Minimum Requirement:
                                                                       Figure - 3. Result 1     

Weight Requirement:
                                                               Figure - 4. Result 2
   
6.  Selection of the preferred alternative
Base on calculation above, Ship Management C become the winner of this bidding with all minimum requirements fulfilled and scores 3,41.

7.    Performance Monitoring & Post Evaluation of Result
This bidding evaluation will be used to construct Ship Management KPI to monitoring and evaluation every quarter years.
Beside all requirement mentioned, we also need to analyze financial component. It will be discussed on next blog posting.

Reference: 
        i.      Maritime Research, Drewry. (2012). Ship Operating Costs Annual Review   and Forecast (annual report 2012/2013),  Section 3 Operating Cost Oil Tanker.
       ii.      Shipping Consultant, Drewry. (2006). Ship Management,  Section 4
      iii.      William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, and C. Patrick Koelling (2011), Engineering Economy (15th Edition), Chapter 14

2 comments:

  1. AWESOME case study Pak Irawan!!! Nice job!!! You picked a really great example and you followed our step by step process almost perfectly and you did your citations with the exception of Sullivan's Engineering Economy....

    Remember it should always be LAST NAME, First Name Initial and Middle Name (i.e. Sullivan, W.G; Wicks, E. M. and Koelling, C. P.)

    Please don't make that mistake on your paper or you risk losing points, which is really foolish because it is something you should know by now...

    BR,
    Dr. PDG, Jakarta, Indonesia

    ReplyDelete
  2. Those sound like some good rules that all of us need to follow! I am just now catching up on your posts a great ideas and your blog is just like a motivation inspire about the goal really appreciated.Thanks
    All terrain cranes Qatar

    ReplyDelete